The paradox of the rational fool: rationality and personal agency in Amartya Sen

  • Henry Daniel Vera-Ramírez SENNOVA-Centro de Servicios Financieros
Keywords: WEA, bounded rationality, rational logic, social welfare function, personal agency

Abstract

The following paper analyzes the relationship between logic and bounded rationality, using as a tool the formalization of two key axioms in the study of welfare economics and decision theory: the WEA (weak of equity axiom) and the social welfare function. For this purpose, we resort to the explanation developed by Sen (1997), from his capabilities approach and the importance of personal agency. It is concluded that, if aspects related to subjectivity and its influence on decisions are not included in the explanatory models—under the traditional logical formalization—, perfect rationality is only an incomplete explanatory model in the valuation given by economic actors to their possible choices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, E. (2001). Symposium on Amartya Sen's philosophy: 2 unstrapping the straitjacket of 'preference': A comment on Amartya Sen's contributions to philosophy and economics. Economics and Philosophy, 17(1), 21-38. http://proxy.bidig.areandina.edu.co:2048/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/213629196?accountid=50441

Bergson, A. (1938). A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics. The Quartely Journal of Economics, 52(2), 233-252.

Brandts, J. (2007). La economía experimental y la economía del comportamiento. https://docplayer.es/11211070-Comportamiento-preparado-para-filosofia-y-economia-una-mirada-metodologica-enciclopedia-iberoamericana-de-filosofia.html .

Casper, H. (2009). Kenneth O. May: A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision. https://staff.science.uva.nl/u.endriss/teaching/modern-classics-2009/slides/may.pdf

Cejudo, R. C. (2010). Deontología y racionalidad económica. Revista de Filosofía, 35(1), 153-171. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RESF/article/view/RESF1010120153A/8909

Cruz, J. (2003). Daniel Kahneman: Un nuevo premio Noble de Economía para la Psicología. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 35(1), 119-121.

Chamberlin, E. (1948). An Experimental Imperfect Market. The Journal of Political Economy, 56(2), 95-108.

Chircusi, M. (2009). Sen's conception of the "capability approach" to assessing deprivation and well-being. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 1(2), 126-130. http://proxy.bidig.areandina.edu.co:2048/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/613689101?accountid=50441.

Díaz, S. (2011). Neuroeconomía: panorama y hallazgos recientes. Revista ODEON, (6), 71-100.

Estrada, F. (2008). Economía y racionalidad de las organizaciones. Los aportes de Herbert A. Simon*. Revista De Estudios Sociales, (31), 84-102. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/815/81503107.pdf

Ferrater, J. y Leblanc, H. (2005). Lógica Matemática. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Jullien, D. (2013). Intentional apple-choice behaviors: when Amartya Sen meets John Searle/Choix de pommes et comportements intentionnels: Lorsque amartya sen rencontre john dewey. Cahiers d'Économie Politique, 65, 97-128. https://www.cairn.info/article.php?ID_ARTICLE=CEP_065_0097

Kagel, J. y Roth, A. (1995). The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press.

May, K. O. (1952). A Set on Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision. Econometrica, (20), 680-684.

Mises, L. (2011). La acción humana: tratado de Economía. Unión Editorial.

Petri, R. (2011). Kantian basis of Amartya Sen's idea of the reasoned scrutinity of thinking. Sats, 12(2), 178-197. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sats.2011.013

Rawls, J. (2006). Teoría de la Justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México

Russell, S. y Norvig, P. (1995). Artificiall Inteligence A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall.

Samuelson, P. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Harvard University Press.

Sargent, T. (2001). Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics. Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. (1997). Sobre la desigualdad económica. Folio.

__________. (1999a). Desarrollo como libertad. Planeta.

__________. (1999b). Sobre ética y economía. Ciencias Sociales. Alianza.

__________. (2002). Introduction: Rationality and Freedom. En A. Sen, Rationality and Freedom (pp. 3-64). Harvard University Press.

__________. (2007). Why exactly is commitment important for rationality. In F. Peter y H.B. Schmid (Eds.), Rationality and Commitment (pp. 17-27). Oxford University Press.

Simon, H. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, (69), 493-513.

Suppes, P. y Hill, S. (1988). Introducción a la lógica matemática. Reverté.

Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristic and Biases. Science, Nez Series, 185(4157), 1124-1131.

__________. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econométrica, 47(2), 263-292.

__________. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, New Series, 211(4481), 453-458.

Venegas, F. (2008). Algunos principios financieros que son consistentes con el postulado de racionalidad económica. En L. Caramés Vieitez (Ed.), Publicaciones de la Cátedra Bolívar. Facultad de Economía y Empresa de la USC. Temas de Teoría Económica y su Método (pp. 11-113). Instituto Politécnico Nacional.

von Neumann, J. (1980). El ordenador y el Cerebro. Conjeturas. Antoni Bosch.
Published
2021-01-17
How to Cite
Vera-Ramírez , H. D. (2021). The paradox of the rational fool: rationality and personal agency in Amartya Sen. Revista De Economía & Administración, 17(2). Retrieved from https://revistas.uao.edu.co/ojs/index.php/REYA/article/view/320
Section
Artículos